wow, that would beca major blunder on ariads part if it was actually another target and not specifically Alk. i highly doubt it, however. it would seem the entire medical community would have got it wrong also.
if the drug has two targets then one can't be sure in general which one (or even the combination) is the key to a particular response.
Many patients with advanced lung cancer carry at least one of the known driver mutations - KRAS, EGFR, HER2, BRAF, PIK3CA, AKT1, MEK1, NRAS, or oncogenic changes - ALK rearrangements and MET amplifications. But if you perform genetic testing on tumor biopsies at the time of diagnosis, you can have a pretty good idea if there's an 'oncogene addiction' of certain type that will most likely respond to a targeted therapy for some time (until resistance emerges).