News Focus
News Focus
icon url

fxsho2008

06/07/11 7:03 PM

#45051 RE: grey #45050

Nice bash but no! The SEC does a sweep of companies that are in question. They compile a list along with reasoning after watching specific stocks for a lengthy period of time. Alos if you look at the list the competition is listed AS WELL AS another solar related company, so the SEC had there eye on the industry including SNRS. I have a personal friend that works for the SEC and deals in these matters. They query what stands out, volume being one, rediculous rises in PPS, outlandish PR's and so on. That is how the list is crafted. That is not to say any company can not be on that list in the future but the likelihood is that other suspensions will not happen in the near future.
icon url

5301

06/07/11 7:22 PM

#45052 RE: grey #45050

Just because this stock doesn't move when and how people want doesn't make it a fraud or scam either. Just because the time lines are not met does not make it a fraud. Just because some people think its a scam does not make it so.

When the CEO puts a PR about something he is called a liar. When the CEO says there is a delay SNRS is called a scam. Hell why bother putting them out, maybe he sees it the same way as well and he will announce the details of everything when he is good and ready.

Hey maybe he is just buying shares after the deal closed on Friday and then will cancel them. Then again maybe he isnt.

There all opinions.
icon url

Black40

06/08/11 12:04 AM

#45068 RE: grey #45050

Com'on Grey, if SNRS hasn't been shut down by the SEC by now after about 100 PR's over the last six months and all the complaints filed, then I think SNRS should be fine legally. (Financially is another matter)