I think we are a lot biased to provide a true and correct answer. BTW, on human rights, we certainly showed the world what a bunch of hypocrites we really are on how we treat human rights, ahem... sorry... I mean "enemy combatants". Our constitution has been trampled but it seems that's ok for some as long as we keep changing the definitions and we have this false sense of being protected. It almost reminds me of the now famous "it depends of what the definition of "is" is". I used to be a republican and in hind sight, I'd take any definition of "is" when talking about someone's personal sexual preference, versus the trampling of our constitution.
JMHO.