News Focus
News Focus
icon url

otraque

05/15/05 7:13 PM

#3651 RE: Ace Hanlon #3649

it is crumbling day by day and more and more hollow and inane will these propaganda visits to Iraq become to those that were sitting on the fence nodding in feint agreement with U.S. policy.
I await the day when that terminally ill with optimistism globalization freak Tom Friedman, formerly moderately worthy columnist now turned hack typist blithering we can do, we can democracize the M.E. into a new great world(he was opposed to Iraq invasion but converted immediately after the fact on his "we must ALWAYS look for the silver lining in every dark cloud" entrenched thought process).
The speech i heard from Seymour Hersh( in which i was delighted to pick on his very sharp wit, his sense of humour, and how he reports the darkness without having his life-force turn dark also) talked about the near total collapse of U.S. journalism to get the real story out.
He mentioned someone named Andy Goodman that he says at least has gotten news out about the collapsing moral of U.S. troops and that more and more see themselves in an operation FUBAR, i haven't tracked down yet.
< And as Vietnam demonstrated, once you lose the moral of your troops you have the lost war, it just takes time for the fact to catch up to the Fools on the Hill.
I my next post i will give an example of the brute force of censorship as it has been now been applied to NewsWeek.


icon url

otraque

05/15/05 7:24 PM

#3652 RE: Ace Hanlon #3649

Newsweek says erred in Koran desecration report By David Morgan
2 hours, 54 minutes ago
( edit: meaning, story was true, but the the very powerful made threats to those behind the story their life won't be worth living if you don't kill your testimony.
As for NewsWeek they probably heard from the kingpins of the NSA telling them that we declare this story be killed in the interest of Nation Security. To not kill this story you will give energy to the terrorists and you would be viewed as encouraging the enemy and certain pressures you will felt applied you would not like.
You my, i live in a country of Free Press, how could i have such thoughts?? Geesus,Mary and Joe!:)--welles
)


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Newsweek magazine on Sunday said it erred in a May 9 report that said U.S. interrogators desecrated the Koran at Guantanamo Bay, and apologized to the victims of deadly Muslim protests sparked by the article.

"We regret that we got any part of our story wrong, and extend our sympathies to victims of the violence and to the U.S. soldiers caught in its midst," Editor Mark Whitaker wrote in the magazine's latest issue, due to appear on U.S. newsstands on Monday.

Whitaker said the magazine inaccurately reported that U.S. military investigators had confirmed that personnel at the detention facility in Cuba had flushed the Koran down the toilet.

The report sparked angry and violent protests across the Muslim world from Afghanistan, where 16 were killed and more than 100 injured, to Pakistan to Indonesia to Gaza. In the past week it was condemned in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Malaysia and by the Arab League. On Sunday, Afghan Muslim clerics threatened to call for a holy war against the United States.

The weekly news magazine said in its May 23 edition that the information had come from a "knowledgeable government source" who told Newsweek that a military report on abuse at Guantanamo Bay said interrogators flushed at least one copy of the Koran down a toilet in a bid to make detainees talk.

But Newsweek said the source later told the magazine he could not be certain he had seen an account of the Koran incident in the military report and that it might have been in other investigative documents or drafts.

The acknowledgment by the magazine came amid a continuing heightened scrutiny of the U.S. media, which has seen a rash of news organizations fire reporters and admit that stories were fabricated or plagiarized.

The Pentagon told the magazine the report was wrong last Friday, saying it had investigated earlier allegations of Koran desecration from detainees and found them "not credible."

The May 9 report, which appeared as a brief item by Michael Isikoff and John Barry in the magazine's "Periscope" section, had a huge international impact, sparking the protests from Muslims who consider the Koran the literal word of God and treat each book with deep reverence.

Desecration of the Koran is punishable by death in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

U.S. officials opened an investigation but maintained that members of the Guantanamo security force were sensitive to the religious beliefs and practices of the detainees in U.S. custody.

U.S. national security adviser Stephen Hadley earlier on Sunday stressed the report had not been confirmed. "First of all, we don't know that it's true," Hadley said on CNN's "Late Edition."

"We've heard these reports before -- if it turns out to be true, obviously we will take action against those responsible," he said.

In January, British prisoners released from Guantanamo said guards threw their Korans into toilets and tried to force them to give up their faith. Human rights lawyer Tom Wilner, who represents several Kuwaiti prisoners at Guantanamo, said in February that his clients told him their Korans were thrown on the floor, stepped on and thrown into toilets at Guantanamo.

Newsweek's Whitaker said that when the magazine first heard of the Koran allegation from its source, staff approached two Defense Department officials. One declined to comment, while the other challenged a different aspect of the May 9 story but did not dispute the Koran charge.

The magazine said other news organizations had already aired charges of Koran desecration based "only on the testimony of detainees."

"We believed our story was newsworthy because a U.S. official said government investigators turned up this evidence. So we published the item," Whitaker said.

"Our original source later said he couldn't be certain about reading of the alleged Koran incident in the report we cited," he wrote.



icon url

otraque

05/15/05 7:36 PM

#3653 RE: Ace Hanlon #3649

Laird in case you missed this post. I have no update but am still contemplating.
<<Posted by: WellesLamont
In reply to: None Date:5/5/2005 8:52:53 PM
Post #of 3652

I have been doing a self analysis of why i have such intense feelings oppositional to Tom HAYDEN.
I realize the Tom HAYDEN that some cruelly called Tom "can i have another drink" HAYDEN for years did since make the most excellent step to sobriety and this is really what has been behind his re-emergence, and i need evaluate him in another light now.
And also recognize i am a "Give me Liberty or Give me Death" type, and have a strong affinity to firebrandness of a Tom Paine nature( who if truth be told the last years of his life was that of a broken man drinking 24/7 an alcoholic in the most extreme of complete degradation---5 people attended his funeral in Schenectedy ,N.Y.--he would not have had land and house to live in if not for his last friend, Thomas Jefferson).
HAYDEN has never written in that manner, i would be much happier with him if he could write a Emile Zola like J'Accuse and have him give it to someone with orative abilities to render it.
And i still stand against his 'we can change the system from within' as i have NEVER believed this and it reveals for myself a non-recognition of what the realities are.
yada yada yada---later.>>