Replies to post #95414 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[Santa Barbara Broker]

Jerry...you are correct. The original filing Expo Holdings R/S cannot be CHANGED. As I explained NUMEROUS times, that would be foolish as a situation where companies could just make a filing disappear after the fact would destroy the paper trail left so that shareholders could have a clear reference to what the company had done. No regulatory body, the NV SOS site, the SEC, FINRA NO ONE allows a filing to be CHANGED once it is in the public records. BUT (and this is where I should have been careful what I wished for because now there is even more misinformation available for misrepresentation and falsification by the usual suspects, lol) that original filing that cannot be changed...it CAN be amended by Expo Holdings. That is what the form they sent you is for. Amending the original filing so as to show the intent of the original filing was incorrect. Incorrect as the company claimed...that it was a "mistake" to file for an R/S...despite the fact that the "Amendment" filing form and the "Reverse Split" filing form are two entirely different forms and not anywhere close to each other where they could be "confused". So, what the company told you is correct. The original filing CANNOT be changed...physically. But it CAN be amended with a SECOND filing...which is something the company is NOT telling you, but the NV SOS WILL TELL YOU if you call them. Once Expo would chose to AMEND the original filing, there would then be TWO filings for the same event. The original "mistaken" filing and the SECOND amended filing, clarifying and correcting the intent of the first. If you need quick proof of this from a public archive that will be easy to source, just go check the EDGAR SEC site for any company you every owned that files. There will be numerous filings that "amend" the original filings for content. You will NEVER see a "changed" filing, but you will find dozens of amended for content filings post original filings.

Too late now as this will serve only to give the source of 50% of all the EXPH misinformation available here a field day to pursue the quest to mislead and cause further harm to EXPH shareholders. But hey, at least I tried to clarify the situation ;-). All IMHO.