Replies to post #95314 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[cantgetmyname]

Really? If the filing for a "split" was done in error, they can correct that error with another filing. Does the original filing remain? Yes.

But it can be superseded by a new one and the "mistake" is not valid.

EXPH has chosen NOT to correct the "split" filing.

You can argue what is basically semantics if you like, but the fact remains, they have filed for a "split" of some kind. Most on this board believe it to be a reverse split. EXPH can easily make that split filing null and void and have not leaving the distinct impression that it was intentional.

[Santa Barbara Broker]

What is being manipulated is....the truth

That is completely correct. No one ever stated that the original form could be altered, it can't. What was stated repeatedly and what is being manipulated is the FACT that an additional superceding form can be filed to correct the first filing that was incorrect. TWO forms filed...the FIRST, the original incorrect filing which STANDS forever as filed, the SECOND the superceding form correcting it. NV SOS has stated this numerous times. It is their policy. Any other rendition is a bald-faced LIE. Expo Holdings can file the superceding form, it has been supplied to them, they have apparently refused because they INTEND TO DO THE R/S THAT WAS FILED FOR IN FEBRUARY.

If the TRUTH about this is twisted a thousand times I will respond exactly one thousand and one times. Seriously, save the bandwidth...Expo Holdings lied or misled, it's been proven as a FACT in numerous posts and from the NV site, now it's just about some cheap, petty semantical manipulation to try and make a desperate case that they didn't. CASE CLOSED. All IMHO.