News Focus
News Focus
icon url

txag92

05/18/11 2:11 PM

#17092 RE: Entangled Proton #17085

This is what I get from your attachments. How this specifically makes a case for BRZL....i'm not sure. I'm all open for good DD, but a lot of what I'm coming across on the board here contains a lot of fluff. No offense to your efforts as it's obvious you put a lot of work into this. Thanks.

Lease 1 = 100 barrels in a month or about 3.3 barrels per day for a property that's not part of the RE/BRZL deal.

Lease 2 = 4000 cubic feet of natural gas.

Lease 3 = safety violations

Lease 4 = Only applies to 2 wells at Cameron Parish School Board - RE, LLC sold the other property according to the sticky.

icon url

wannabeatrader

05/19/11 12:47 AM

#17242 RE: Entangled Proton #17085

Admiral,

I was wondering if you could clarify something. I noticed a lot of the reports are from 2010. Are newer reports available. I have seen on sonris that we do have some producing wells but I was a bit confuse with the letter from the Louisiana DNR about some projects that were green lighted and Renfro never responded. Also I noticed on the envelope that it was marked RETURN TO SENDER, just wondering on your thoughts.

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:nam9kPZ1HNUJ:dnrucm.dnr.state.la.us/ucm/groups/coastalmanagement/documents/ocm/3636497.pdf+%22petroleum+capital%22+dallas+texas+renfro&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESinBJ9h3T7ujileyV4llIyk1hiXCkwh8NuoxLY6v0BbEsfIMKWRKwLxCuYnxKcxUkKJ4cMvAWVEcQFUhHPzfhYZGBhIrgwiigoNNdieKediY4hEJKI8La0yJ9A3yX_2Lt3Jiync&sig=AHIEtbSaEClsXflJDleFaMeLpzZKHpHFCQ