Seems to me I recall some folks claiming Madoff was never involved in naked shorting even though he was kind enough to help the SEC write the exemption that they were kind enough to name after him. Anyone else remember that?
captured is the polite use <term> what should be written is crooked as hell
as in the SEC and DTCC
==
The report that was produced for the Defense Department (the same report I cited at the outset of this story) states that there is a possibility that the SEC and the DTCC (a self-regulating body responsible for ensuring settlement of short sales and other transactions) were compromised by organized crime or even foreign enemies of the state. The report concludes: “Implications that these parties [the SEC, the DTCC, and other Wall Street institutions] have been complicit [in acts of financial terrorism] or otherwise co-opted cannot be ruled out.”
That statement is not preposterous. Bernard Madoff was not the only suspect character roaming the halls of the nation’s regulatory bodies. We have seen that Sheikh DeLorenzo (he with the Al Qaeda partner linked to the military spy scandal) also received favorable treatment from the SEC, which allowed him to set up Al Safi Trust’s naked short selling machine in 2007. And as we will see, there were still other, equally dangerous people who “captured” officials at both the DTCC and the SEC.
One hypothesis is that some of the Ponzi’s feeders (i.e. the people whom I have just named and their clients) wanted Madoff’s brokerage to engage in manipulative naked short selling, generating phantom stock to drive down the markets.
And whose "hypothesis" would that be? Yours?
The authorities know exactly what Madoff was doing.
lol, the rest of it is just hilarious, descending every deeper into the pit of conspiracy lunacy.