Replies to post #20177 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[es1]

Send me your list of questions or post them here JB. I will answer every one of them that is possible. I personally have not seen 27 questions out of you and I think just about every time you have one of your doomsday questions I have answered you or someone has.

I think your are taking your inability to accept an answer and thinking it is the same as not getting an answer.

Its all good. I have 3 kids so getting asked the same question over and over in a short time doesnt bother me. I will be happy to take the time to publicly answer your questions or at least find the answer.


Whats your first question??

[ZincFinger]

IMHO,the reason you don't get replies to some of your questions is that they are too vague, and lack critical details and have no references. For example:

"1) In prusing all the documentation available, I have come across what appears to be "Directors" to the company, all related to Mr. Thompson. Can you please confirm that there is or is not a BOD in operation, and if so, who the members are? In past filings, directors are listed and appear to be "family memebers" of the CEO, but then they "disappeared" in current filings."

In which documents did you "come across what appears to be" "Directors" to the company?

What led you to believe that they were directors? Did the documents identify them as such or are you just making an inference that they are?(which is what your wording leads one to believe). If you are making an inference that they are, what is the basis for that inference and why aren't you telling it to us? [[IMHO it is important to know the basis for inferences in order to be able to judge whether the question even merits looking into.]]

How could you possibly expect someone to find out what you are talking about with such vague details and no reference?

The lack of references, the ambiguity whether something was said or inferred and the complete inability to even determine exactly what your concern is based on all, IMHO make it unreasonably difficult if not impossible to supply the kind of hard evidence you appear to be demanding.

If you really do want answers, supplying references and adequate details would, IMHO, go a long way toward getting them. If you aren't concerned enough about it to go to that little bit of trouble, is it reasonable to expect someone else to go to a lot more trouble because of what you left out?

[TheEternalChampion]

This board has no problem with new posters. This board (group), just as any board does not like or encourage posters who post blatently innacurate information or information with no found source. Whether you're new or old don't pull facts out of your (where ever) and say they are facts. And yes. WE WILL CALL YOU ON YOUR POST. It's a good thing. Sorts the BS from the truth. We want to be challenged, we want to find holes in the company to either tell us to get the heck out or so that we can light up the CEO's email and phone. We have had our share of one time posters who have no idea what they're talking about or are just here for devious purposes and because everyone here is open and proactive they remain one time posters.

Jimmy please post your post # so we can see the question from today that we didn't answer. I looked back at your posts when you initially said that we didn't answer (with valid intent to answer you), but I didn't see any post where you asked a direct question. Then I found your offended because over months you've asked questions apparently that havent been answered. Jimmy if I (we) happened to miss your question simply because I or anyone else just happened to miss it. Just source your post and ask again. I don't understand the hostility. If it's what do we pay Ben for??? Yeah, no answer there. Thought that was rhetorical.
If it's what the plan is? Zinc laid out a whole page of what his spec for KBLB's plan is and I beleive manshoon1 laid out his thoughts also, me too (but we are all of course just speculating, we don't have a real answer. Only kim has the answer really. So that HAS been answered (as best as it can by the folks here).


The other thing here is that 95 if not 99.9% of the companies info is laid out right on this board and in the IBOX. We all know the worst thing going for this company is the financials and have discussed that for years. Literally years. And you've been here (so you said) for that long. So again, I don't get it. None of us like the fact that KBLB keeps racking up debt and brings no cash to the table. No one has ever argued that or tried to hide that. (At least not that I've seen) In case you didn't know KBLB is a research play, not a retail play (KNOW WHAT YOU OWN). It was when you got in and it still is, if your worried about that now then your way late on getting out. They don't make anything that they can sell yet. When the research is done, then maybe we see the payday (and hopefully a Big one)Anyone else feel free to help me out here.

New posters are always appreciated. The more points of view the better.

GO KBLB.

[first mike]

Hi JB,

A newbie to this board, But not to KBLB.

I was an early investor @ .01 watched it go to .013,
then after no newws and no movement for a loong time I got out witha small profit but kept my eye on it.
When it started to rise I got in again at .03, out at .20 and back in at ~.12 several times bigger.

Though I have "Traded" a bit I am basicly an investor drawn to the company by what I see as a potentially disruptive technology.
(as in LASERs, fiber optics, WIFI, etc.) I am a retired scientist and tend to invest where possible in companies that I find in technical journals.

I am aware of the weak financials of the company, but that is almost always the case with a research and development stage company. They tend either to make it big or to die quietly.
I am hoping that KBLB will make it.
I also am bothered by the obscene amount of no cost options that the current publicity company claims to hold.
Other than financial default, the two main worries of a start up investor are that the company will so dillute its stock that early private investors are left holding a bag of air, or that the company will be bought out cheaply by a larger player in the field.

-- Mike L.