Replies to post #233673 on Green Energy Enterprises Inc. (GYOG)

[baldeagle9999]

remember this when the facts about mineseeker come out; there exists a tortios interference but your looking in the wrong place

Tortious interference with business relationships occurs where the tortfeasor acts to prevent the plaintiff from successfully establishing or maintaining business relationships. This tort may occur when a first party's conduct intentionally causes a second party not to enter into a business relationship with a third party that otherwise would probably have occurred. Such conduct is termed tortious interference with prospective business relations, expectations, or advantage or with prospective economic advantage.

First of all I find it highly suspect that you, as the supposed CEO of QASP, are making this kind of comment on a public message board.

The only purpose of the comment is to infer that Jeff was involved in killing a deal between QASP and Mineseeker. Is that what you are saying?

In my non-legal opinion you are engaging in a blatant attempt at stock manipulation.

My understaning is that Mineseeker was never in a binding contractual relationship when the change of leadership took place last September.

It is also my understanding that you sent a communication to Mineseeker telling them that they were somehow involved in a deal with QASP and you detailed remifications.

It is my understanding that Mineseeker replied to your communication and stated basically shame on you for lying about any relationship with QASP and that you interference was despicable and the delays caused were costing lives.

While I don't pretend to fully understand the actions taken by Jeff/James in relation to Mineseeker from that point forward, I find it highly unlikely that either person would be dumb enough to do something illegal while under the scrutiny of every relevant legal authority there is.

On the other hand, given your background as a scam artist, and know affiliations with known criminals (Dean Bradley), I find it very plausible that you are guilty of improper action relative to Mineseeker.

JMHO of course.

[artfink]

Joe, all we want to know from you is who the Quasar Board of Directors is and how you plan to add VALUE to Quasar Shareholders. Those are the two items we need in order to determine if an exchange of our shares makes sense to not.

But, I forgot, you can't give that info because YOU are NOT the CEO of Quasar.

[crazy horse 0]

"who is the Quasar Board of Directors is and how you plan to add VALUE to Quasar Shareholders"

Will you answer Joe. Artfink has been asking you this Question for months. You are the CEO right ?

[packerfan9]

True Joe you should know since you and Josh seemed to be the interference. Mike K of Mineseeker seems to feel same way. Then more interference Joe trying to not allow shareholders from voting on who they want for BOD and CEO. To vote do they want more Dean level dilution. Your plan is a joke for shareholders. We got killed by last dilution and you think best for us to do more. Ridiculous.

[Investman432]

You allege Jeff attempted to misappropriate a business opportunity from QASP and/or interfere with QASP's relationship with Mineseeker. Even if these allegations are true, I don't see any damages to QASP shareholders, because QASP hasn't ever been able to perform (i.e., make an investment) with respect to Mineseeker opportunities, and QASP hasn't been disadvantaged to the extent there remains an opportunity with Mineseeker -- in other words -- even if you have evidence Jeff tried (but didn't succeed) to take away an opportunity there's no harm/no foul.

In fact, your and Dean's actions have directly harmed, and continue to harm, QASP shareholders, especially the direct interference in QASP's business.

[tommy2117]

Joe

Put together some quotes from a relevant movie that may really hit home about now:

" Man looks in the abyss, there's nothing staring back at him. At that moment, man finds his character. And that is what keeps him out of the abyss."

"The main thing about money, Bud, is that it makes you do things you don't want to do."

"When you've had money and lost it, it can be much worse than never having had it at all!"(my fav for you)

Took the liberty of altering this one a bit:

"Bradley, where the hell are you? I am losing MILLIONS! You got me into this SCAM and you sure as hell better get me out or the only job you'll ever have on the Street is SWEEPING IT! You hear me, Bradley!!"

Happy Mothers Day Joe....you'll be someone's mother on the inside real soon.

[SJOGRINGO]

Joe advise meeting date !!

signed

You Boss

SJO

[dehydratedman]

Joe,
Letter of Intent...was from what comapany? You were not the CEO of Quasar at that time (March 31, 2011). Sounds like Dean and yourself were trying to steal Minseeker and place it in a company of your own...I bet that would have been a (insert finger quotes here) "Trophy" of a company!!! Here is a copy of that agreement between you and Dean... http://www.mediafire.com/?vq02rbm4hynb6au . Is that the definition of Tortious Interference???

Dear Mr. Canouse -
The "heads of terms" attached to your e-mail dated March 31, 2011 was a non-binding letter of intent. That is what it was intended to be and that is all it was. As such, it is of no legal force or effect for a variety of reasons, including the following:
a. It was subject to legally binding documents being signed, which never were signed.
b. Mineseeker Holdings, Inc., ("MHI") the entity which could have benefited from a legally binding agreement, was never fully constituted and therefore unable to formalize any such agreement.
c. Even if MHI had been formed, you would have had no interest in that entity or any right to act on its behalf.
d. Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.("Quasar") would have had no rights under any legally binding agreement, had one been entered into.
e. The payments made pursuant to the Option and Share Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") were non-refundable option payments and not loan advances. The Agreement had expired in accordance with its terms and the non-binding letter of intent outlined a possible new structure whereby an ownership interest in Mineseeker Operations Overseas, Ltd. would be granted in exchange for a new equity investment of $1,000,000, conversion of the option payments to a loan and simultaneous cancellation of that loan. We understood that this new structure would benefit the shareholders of Quasar. In any event, the details were never worked-out and the structure was never put in place. To the extent that the non-binding letter of intent was not clear on any of that, it would have been clarified had a legally binding document been executed.
f. The $1,000,000 in additional funding was never provided.
Please be further advised that your public claims that the non-refundable option payments made pursuant to the Agreement were loans made by Quasar are untrue and misleading, and remain actionable on several legal bases.
Although Quasar failed to complete the funding as per the Option and Purchase Agreement it entered in to, and the additional $1,000,000 in funding outlined in the letter of intent together with the ensuing delays has cost us many millions of dollars, it is not just about money. It is about a great humanitarian disaster that costs lives and legs every day. For every day of delay with the deployment of this technology, people step on mines and other unexploded ordinance. They are either killed or maimed. Either way, it is horrific. Delays caused by your corporate squabbling are hurting people who are amongst the poorest in the world, which is immoral, unfair and unjust.

Very truly yours,
Mineseeker Operations Overseas, Ltd.
Michael Kendrick
7th April 2011.

GeneO

[buyfear]

From an email posted here it doesn't look like Mike Kendrick cares for you and your actions.

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Mr. Canouse -
The "heads of terms" attached to your e-mail dated March 31, 2011 was a non-binding letter of intent. That is what it was intended to be and that is all it was. As such, it is of no legal force or effect for a variety of reasons, including the following:
a. It was subject to legally binding documents being signed, which never were signed.
b. Mineseeker Holdings, Inc., ("MHI") the entity which could have benefited from a legally binding agreement, was never fully constituted and therefore unable to formalize any such agreement.
c. Even if MHI had been formed, you would have had no interest in that entity or any right to act on its behalf.
d. Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.("Quasar") would have had no rights under any legally binding agreement, had one been entered into.
e. The payments made pursuant to the Option and Share Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") were non-refundable option payments and not loan advances. The Agreement had expired in accordance with its terms and the non-binding letter of intent outlined a possible new structure whereby an ownership interest in Mineseeker Operations Overseas, Ltd. would be granted in exchange for a new equity investment of $1,000,000, conversion of the option payments to a loan and simultaneous cancellation of that loan. We understood that this new structure would benefit the shareholders of Quasar. In any event, the details were never worked-out and the structure was never put in place. To the extent that the non-binding letter of intent was not clear on any of that, it would have been clarified had a legally binding document been executed.
f. The $1,000,000 in additional funding was never provided.
Please be further advised that your public claims that the non-refundable option payments made pursuant to the Agreement were loans made by Quasar are untrue and misleading, and remain actionable on several legal bases.
Although Quasar failed to complete the funding as per the Option and Purchase Agreement it entered in to, and the additional $1,000,000 in funding outlined in the letter of intent together with the ensuing delays has cost us many millions of dollars, it is not just about money. It is about a great humanitarian disaster that costs lives and legs every day. For every day of delay with the deployment of this technology, people step on mines and other unexploded ordinance. They are either killed or maimed. Either way, it is horrific. Delays caused by your corporate squabbling are hurting people who are amongst the poorest in the world, which is immoral, unfair and unjust.

Very truly yours,
Mineseeker Operations Overseas, Ltd.
Michael Kendrick
7th April 2011.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=61837416

[cosmoworld7]

whats the word turd?