"That is not an article, my friend.. that is a paid promotion, not unlike all the paid promotions going on lately, and frankly a little disappointing to see.."
How could I be so wrong in seeing many, many irrefutable facts in what you correctly described as a promotional piece. Promotion it may be, but that alone does not make it fraud and deception, or am I just blind?
If you can, why don't you show us where that piece is wrong and misleading. I know I would very much appreciate seeing something I may be overlooking, and have been overlooking as I continue buying shares.
Moreover, the piece was written so long ago, it doesn't even touch on claims later filed at Silver Bell, Walnut Creek/Tombstone, and Bonanza Hills, etc., based on the same geophysical principals. ...forget the uranium claims for a moment.
...and Dr. John M. Guilbert is still on the Board of Directors! Don't you think a person of his credentials has a reputation to protect, and would be very unlikely to be connected with a scam for the first time in life?
I am quite eagerly awaiting your reply, as I need an excuse to sell before this all falls apart as the fraud you are suggesting it is.
Thanks.
VP in AZ
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
