News Focus
News Focus
icon url

dneighnay

05/01/11 5:27 PM

#18261 RE: BenK #18260

Ben - this is the first time I have seen someone (particularly you) admit that Mammoth was creating some of the problem.
Thanks......
icon url

bigmoonshot

05/02/11 6:14 AM

#18268 RE: BenK #18260

It's good to know that Ed is 'painfully aware' of this potential dilution now based on conversations that I assume you had with him recently. However, I was more than concerned about this back in November when this Mammoth funding was announced (i.e. posts 15487 & 15490). I don't care what Ed has heard from others regarding Mammoth's so-called reputed integrity. Without any kind of time restriction on shares along with a 25% discount, it was an invitation to sell for a sure profit. I'm sure one can say that it's 20-20 hindsight that Ed should not have done this without a time restriction. However, from Mammoth's business standpoint, it was an easy no-brainer decision. They had every reason to sell and bring the stock price lower. Who's to say that they didn't also take a short position as well. I'm sorry to say it but this fault lies squarely with our CEO.
icon url

goforthebet

05/02/11 7:16 AM

#18270 RE: BenK #18260

Ben, its great when its like that, but we have not heard about in any press release, or did I miss something?

"That is precisely why he is not taking more shares from Mammoth, rather accepting private placements that are restricted for many months"