Replies to post #150807 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[Susie924]

those that have a history of many YEARS of only trashing a stock,

I bet if you check "those people" have been correct 99.9% of the time too.

[Tavycal]

Posters dont trash a stock, the companies do that on their own. It is however irrelavant since pro and con are good.

[Cassandra]

Apparently the percentage of complaints iHub receives regarding Admin bias are evenly split by the advocates and the critics of the various stocks discussed on the site: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=9357987

I'm primarily a critic of the stocks about which I post and all three Admins could certainly verify that I've filed my share of complaints about overtly biased moderators and unfair post deletions that they upheld.

However, because of the PMs I receive from devoted longs of these stocks (currently MDGC in particular), I know the Admins are being pressured to stop me from posting altogether. A repetive theme of these PMs is that iHub is in kahootz with my posting of critical information.

The real problem these posters face is that the DD (due diligence) I post is based on facts, which they can't refute. Therefore it's easier to just try to prevent me from posting.

[Zorax]

Well, how do you explain that you've been allowed to have a ticker symbol for an alias? That's not supposed to be allowed I believe.

...considering you've made almost 8,000 posts on erhc alone....


ulp, never mind.
I'm sure you'll be back as a different alias soon.