miler, had you written the post to which you refer,
I likely would have complimented you on writing it,
and wondered if spokeshave had been your ghost writer! His was a well-reasoned discussion of the state of risk-valuing a company's stock on the basis of its measurable productivity - or lack thereof - and its resulting financial status. Your post, lamentably, took an (ill-considered, imo) swipe at the quality of NVC's PRs (you selected the word "fluff", not me or anyone else. Please take responsibility for it and its all too obvious implications and likely affect on would-be investors in NVC's stock). Spokeshave's post was not an attack on the company. Your post was. It really is that simple.
Hitimer - Rob
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
