News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Warby 3

04/07/11 2:13 PM

#228102 RE: B*A*N*K*E*R #228099

bradley did not just screw the qasp shareholders once
he did it multiple times

"because he can"

the guy has to go to prison

no plea deal for the guy
what kind of example would that be?

i can't follow that



people like him need to be brought to justice
and I applaud Jeff D
for doing the right thing back in October of 2010
now i Hope and expect the authorities to do a good job here
and nothing else will make me feel satisfied
we have been through total nonsense for almost two years
a total waste of energy
and I hate being lied to
icon url

9bruce

04/07/11 2:30 PM

#228107 RE: B*A*N*K*E*R #228099

Ignorance is no excuse

in the eyes of the law, as many find out know when dealing with the IRS.
The very few times it can be used, is when there are extenuating circumstances. In a business environment saying "I didn't know", or "GEE shucks I wasn't aware of that", won't wash and only provokes deeper digging. The pinky scum, and you know who I mean, if matters are pursued beyond where it concerns QASP "common shareholders losses" could become very, very serious.
One only has to look at the economic situation and just a few of the reasons it is where it is to realize that the term "THROW THE BOOK AT THEM" is becoming the in vogue pattern.
B.
icon url

crazy horse 0

04/07/11 5:51 PM

#228185 RE: B*A*N*K*E*R #228099

Thanks B*A*N*K*E*R, Brokerages, that is interesting


If the or a Brokerage Company were involved then we could have one heck of a case,
. Better yet Jeff would have one heck of a case.


Well, he gave monies to companies some good some scam, it takes only to follow the money and then find out what they knew about qasp to prove fraud...just thinking out loud. Some of the monies went to brokers I think those monies would not be too hard to get. Nobody knows how easy or hard it would be at this point it is a legal issue. If you were enriched by a fraud I do not know if you had to be aware of it or not in a civil trial if you did not give like (equitable) compensation in terms of value.

Say for instance Apex was not for sale to anyone else except qasp and it was being sold for more than it was worth and all parties should have known it then I am sure there is exposure to reverse the transaction, again it would be nice for dean to roll as part of a plea agreement on each source and that could happen.

When dean and Joe start pointing fingers at each other much should come to light in my opinion.

T.