News Focus
News Focus
icon url

rokosnik

04/02/11 12:28 PM

#18096 RE: mikeymgd #18094

Agree 100%.!
icon url

risk on

04/02/11 12:32 PM

#18097 RE: mikeymgd #18094

I think You said it earlier and I agree that the Financials themselves are going to build a majority of credibilty. But, You also just said that it was a promotional campaign on a non reporting Co. that landed SNEY where they are, and I too competely agree. Given that, I am sure You can see why I do not want anything that resembles the same action for which they alledgedlly got CE status. It could easily be misconstrued by PINK, and SNEY is not going to take that chance this close to CE being removed. The decision to remove CE is up to PINK, financials or no, and We do not want PINK reveiwing SNEY's behavior prior to their decision and noticing a PR stream that results in a rapid run up - surely that could not help the cause. I would much rather have a big production number from a FULLY REPORTING Co., as opposed to one with a skull and bones, agreed? That is what SNEY said they are doing, and that is what they are doing. I think SNEY doing what they say at this point is of upmost importance to anyone LONG. So, Mike, I guess it is really a matter of what term a person is looking to stay invested with SNEY that will dictate what they want to see out of the Company's behavior with respect to CE.