Replies to post #40980 on Signature Devices Inc. (SDVI)

[Scooter72]

Agreed Bionic.. that is a strange indiscrepancy between the PR and the VCC.

I would also like to know, given the importance placed upon Phatyaffle, why the website is nearly derelict? It's not meant as a jibe, but honestly, for all the intentions Ken expressed in one of the VCCs, towards Phatyaffle, I just do not understand why it is so neglected. And that is just ONE neglected part of SDVI.

Methinks Ken needs help, and not just in the form of competent programmers. Let us know, Ken.

[nicoboy]

Hey Bionic,

No worries, I didn't mean for my original response to you to come off gruff. If you look, the PR from the M&A Media Group is 3 years old already, a lot happens in 3 years, both positive and negative.

RJ

[Saredi]

I've always been under the impression that 'not making any money' was a reference to not making any profit, whereas the PR advised potential revenue only. i.e. They may have made a bundle of revenue, but due to costs, no profit. Or, since it spoke of potential earnings, the deals never materialized. The audits may clear this up though, assuming subsidiaries are included in the valuation.

Cheers,
Saredi