Replies to post #99718 on Encounter Development Technologies Inc. (ENTI)

[DevG]

Great...i'll engage and answer:

...connecting dots...sometimes quite "certain" dots, and some, speculation, with support...others, sure, fuzzy...

.first dot: what was the reason CEO gagged TA in first place? Wasn't to hide dilution, as was screamed/cried about from the moment it was gagged until financials came out...So...what was the reason? This points to another reason being POSSIBLE...just a point...POSSIBLE something behind gagging TA besides dilution? ABSOLUTELY, YES...this shows that it's possible..at least it was for the entire period during gag to financials, yes?

..second dot: CEO indicated multiple times, in multiple forums (via email, PR, messages, podcasts..etc), a desire to reward shareholders, and that their support/loyalty would be rewarded (please, hold on the knee-jerk reaction of "oh yeah, CEOs say that to...")...stick with me here...Declaration of the Divi WAS aimed at rewarding shareholders, but just as much, IMO, to cause a slowdown/glitch in shorting system of MMs...(did it have effect? i believe it did..NOT the way many speculated, but did slow and even chill shorting/electronic trading/borrowing).

...third dot: Uplisting....gagging until uplisting...setting pps, or even stating the possible range...all point to some belief by ENTI professional consultants/advisors, with TREMENDOUS real world financial/securities experience, that some range significantly higher than present, is reasonable, and likely...TONY said no r/s, and no buyback by ENTI..but that doesn't remove another factor not spoken about...he had told me via Q&A call that there's no "tricks" like reverse merger or like that..but this doesn't remove possible scenarios involving s/s...besides direct buyback...

....fourth dot: $20,000,000 LOC based strictly on uplisting...that doesn't come without some relatively solid basis/rational....what was that based on besides what we know?

.....fifth dot: NOT giving much weight, but even slightest weight should be considered...to email from TA to gort...I'm setting this as almost NO WEIGHT, but we have yet to hear from TA it was wrong, or any response, it seems...

speculation, speculation, speculation..but some dots are more solid than others....

why gag the TA? reward shareholders, allow pps movement, or allow pps to be more accurate reflection of company value, outside manipulation and plans of massive shorting and other manipulative technique entities such as MMS....and bring in line with uplisting pps spoken about...when s/s IS released...

last point, main point, sure, there's a number of possibilities..including company selling shares..sure...not hard to say.....just acknowledging diff possibilities too..based on history with this CEO.