Replies to post #92029 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[Acc441]

thanks underdog.....great post and I look forward to the additional posts you plan for Saturday. Sure does paint a very CLEAR picture.

[fourkids_9pets]

and that is all well and fine since
anyone can go back and pull up a post
from a specific time period .. what isn't
posted is the follow thru .. ie what i posted
about directly after the SM .. believe me two
can play that game if they choose .. i wasn't
the one gushing about LOCs' and banks re: EXPO

and exactly why does this same topic keep being
brought up .. regardless of how many times i'm
asked about it .. my answer doesn't change .. it's
clear i expected that the new ceo would be introduced
and fins pr'd .. they weren't .. but last i checked i
don't control that :)

should i troll back and find the post
where i comment about the PR out after the SM

should i comment *again* that i wouldn't have
held the SM .. that i expressed my displeasure
to mgmt within a week or so of the SM being held

personally not only would i have not held the SM

i wouldn't have paid pink sheets to upload fy 2009
i wouldn't have paid the firm re: fy 2009 fins
i would have had the TA go totally dark
i would have kept one website only <expo>

until there was far less volatility and cash flow stabilized

but and this is what really matters and why the SM was held

being fortunate enough to interact with more than a few who are
ACTUAL SOR .. WHO DID ATTEND THE SM <9/15/2010> .. what is
clearly understood is that the MAJORITY OF EXPH SHARES
ARE HELD BY VERY FEW .. imo after being played like a violin
in 2009 .. mgmt wised up and became very aware .. of what ..
why .. and when .. imo within a week of the turn the prior year <9/15/2009>

i'm not asking nor looking for anyone's *agreement*
i have my opinion based on who i interact with and
the time frame i've been in this co. via their stock

==
4kids
all jmo