Replies to post #9056 on Value Microcaps Motherboard

[bones1420]

cartonet, an investor of any level could throw darts at this "Value Microcap" board and do better than any other info-source i've seen to date! PERIOD!

hweb, bob, len, see RR's previous post on ANH, and countless other posters here provide some excellent insight.

now, it's a simple request, post companies w/earnings here...there are tens of threads out there w/roll-the-dice-plays...why clutter up this one, too?

I'm with Len's rules (w/the exception of those intrinsic-value-plays trading below cash, lol)...the other posters here would also be wise, imo, to slam these NO-VALUE-posts, toot sweet, we've all seen these threads turn to trash in a hurry.

[lentinman]

cartonet: TETY:

I'm sorry you feel that way, but it boggles my mind that you would think our "rules" are stringent. All we require is at least 1 PENNY of earnings in the most recent quarter. I mean, theoretically, you could have lost 15 cents, 14 cents, 13 cents and then make .00001 cent in the most recent quarter and I would let that go. How that can be called "stringent" is beyond me - especially when the board is very clearly labeled "Value" and repeatedly defined as having earnings.

If we were stringent, we would say a TRUE PE of <10 using the last 4 quarters earnings.

I fail to see why someone doesn't want to post on the ZCC board unless they only want to be concerned with getting the largest audience - irrespective of whether that audience is right for their stock. I just don't get it. I would post where I thought I had a willing audience.

Anyway, please don't take this personally! I hope you will continue to post. Right now, I have a list of about several hundred small or micro caps that qualify for the board - and I'm sure there are more. Plenty of good stocks to talk about.

Len