News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jimmym4

02/21/11 10:03 AM

#81763 RE: SchlumpyStock-Picker #81759

Wisconsin's Tunisia Moment

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-kuttner/wisconsins-tunisia-moment_b_825738.html

Here at home, over-reaching by a novice Republican governor of Wisconsin has finally triggered the protest marches that have been eerily missing during the more than three years of an economic crisis that has savaged the middle and bottom and rewarded the top.

It's not as if we lack a politics of class. As mega-investor Warren Buffett famously said, there is plenty of class warfare in America, but the billionaire class is winning.

This economic crisis, after all, was brought on by excesses on Wall Street. Yet with the rest of the economy still mired in high unemployment and fiscal crises of public services, Wall Street was first to be bailed out, the first to return to exorbitant profitability, and the last to be held accountable.

But this time, Republicans overreached, and the long smoldering economic unease has finally sparked mass demonstrations. Rather than following the script and resenting public employees as a privileged "other," the citizens of Madison increasingly view teachers, nurses, cops, firefighters, and other public workers as their violated neighbors.

One recent poll showed that two-thirds of Wisconsin citizens polled (none from public employee families) felt that Walker had gone too far. Even citizens who wanted public workers to pay more of the costs of their benefits concluded that his scheme was excessive. Another poll, sponsored by an Illinois Manufacturers Association, found a similar result.

Now, mass protest has broken out in other states where Republican governors are attacking unions, tens of thousands of other citizens are joining their union brothers and sisters, and even the mainstream press is taking sympathetic notice. In a fine piece in Saturday's Times, Michael Cooper and Kit Seelye asked: "Is Wisconsin the Tunisia of collective bargaining rights?"

Maybe it is. And not just of collective bargaining rights.

At long last, resentment against the economic crisis is beginning to find its natural home, where it always belonged -- against financial elites, their privileges and Republican allies. It is dawning on ordinary voters that something is wrong when hedge fund billionaires and investment bankers are making more than ever, while public workers (average Wisconsin pay: $48,000) are being made the scapegoats.

This is going viral all I can say is IT'S ABOUT TIME~~!!!
icon url

teapeebubbles

02/21/11 4:52 PM

#81768 RE: SchlumpyStock-Picker #81759

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's (R) union-busting efforts aren't making compromise easy, but that doesn't mean options aren't available.

The most obvious is also the easiest -- state workers are prepared to accept less pay and fewer benefits, and in exchange, Walker would be expected to drop his punitive and unnecessary demands that workers give up their collective-bargaining rights. The governor has already said this isn't a deal he would even consider.

Which leads us to another possible compromise.

With Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker maintaining a hard line on his budget bill and Democratic senators refusing to return to Madison to vote, attention is turning to a group of moderate Republican senators to negotiate a compromise to the stalemate that has drawn thousands of protesters to the state capital for a sixth straight day.

The proposal, written by Sen. Dale Schultz and first floated in the Republican caucus early last week, calls for most collective bargaining rights of public employee unions to be eliminated -- per Mr. Walker's bill -- but then reinstated in 2013, said Mr. Schultzs's chief of staff Todd Allbaugh.



Now, as compromises go, this doesn't sound like much of a deal for state employees. The state would temporarily strip workers of the collective-bargaining rights, but then bring them back later.

As it turns out, it doesn't much matter whether labor would go for something like this -- Walker announced this morning that this isn't good enough, either. He wants both the cuts and the union-busting provisions, and will accept nothing less.

That said, it is interesting that a Republican state senator is open to a resolution that would deny the conservative governor his full agenda. It's worth keeping an eye out for other cracks in the united GOP front.
icon url

teapeebubbles

02/21/11 4:57 PM

#81772 RE: SchlumpyStock-Picker #81759

Once state employees in Wisconsin announced their willingness to accept benefit cuts, but not the revocation of their collective bargaining rights, the nature of the debate changed. It looked as if Gov. Scott Walker (R) was advancing a punitive, unnecessary union-busting agenda, but once his budget demands had been met, and he still refused to work with Democrats and his own state employees, appearances no longer mattered -- this is a punitive, unnecessary union-busting agenda.

The next question is why Walker and other Republican leaders consider this such a high priority. The obvious answer is that the GOP has always been hostile to labor; it's part of the party's raison d'etre. But it's worth taking the next step and appreciating what drives the antagonism.

Paul Krugman's column today makes the case well.

In principle, every American citizen has an equal say in our political process. In practice, of course, some of us are more equal than others. Billionaires can field armies of lobbyists; they can finance think tanks that put the desired spin on policy issues; they can funnel cash to politicians with sympathetic views (as the Koch brothers did in the case of Mr. Walker). On paper, we're a one-person-one-vote nation; in reality, we're more than a bit of an oligarchy, in which a handful of wealthy people dominate.

Given this reality, it's important to have institutions that can act as counterweights to the power of big money. And unions are among the most important of these institutions.

You don't have to love unions, you don't have to believe that their policy positions are always right, to recognize that they're among the few influential players in our political system representing the interests of middle- and working-class Americans, as opposed to the wealthy. Indeed, if America has become more oligarchic and less democratic over the last 30 years -- which it has -- that's to an important extent due to the decline of private-sector unions.

And now Mr. Walker and his backers are trying to get rid of public-sector unions, too.

There's a bitter irony here. The fiscal crisis in Wisconsin, as in other states, was largely caused by the increasing power of America's oligarchy. After all, it was superwealthy players, not the general public, who pushed for financial deregulation and thereby set the stage for the economic crisis of 2008-9, a crisis whose aftermath is the main reason for the current budget crunch. And now the political right is trying to exploit that very crisis, using it to remove one of the few remaining checks on oligarchic influence.



I'm reminded, from time to time, of something John Boehner said in July, when he accused Democrats of "snuffing out the America that I grew up in." This occurred to me in the wake of the GOP's anti-union efforts because the America Boehner grew up in featured large union memberships throughout society, and the "right to form a union was broadly accepted."

If Boehner wants to protect the norms of that bygone era, and prevent the "snuffing out" of the America he grew up in, the House Speaker is fighting for the wrong side.

icon url

teapeebubbles

02/21/11 4:58 PM

#81773 RE: SchlumpyStock-Picker #81759

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's (R) union-busting efforts aren't making compromise easy, but that doesn't mean options aren't available.

The most obvious is also the easiest -- state workers are prepared to accept less pay and fewer benefits, and in exchange, Walker would be expected to drop his punitive and unnecessary demands that workers give up their collective-bargaining rights. The governor has already said this isn't a deal he would even consider.

Which leads us to another possible compromise.

With Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker maintaining a hard line on his budget bill and Democratic senators refusing to return to Madison to vote, attention is turning to a group of moderate Republican senators to negotiate a compromise to the stalemate that has drawn thousands of protesters to the state capital for a sixth straight day.

The proposal, written by Sen. Dale Schultz and first floated in the Republican caucus early last week, calls for most collective bargaining rights of public employee unions to be eliminated -- per Mr. Walker's bill -- but then reinstated in 2013, said Mr. Schultzs's chief of staff Todd Allbaugh.



Now, as compromises go, this doesn't sound like much of a deal for state employees. The state would temporarily strip workers of the collective-bargaining rights, but then bring them back later.

As it turns out, it doesn't much matter whether labor would go for something like this -- Walker announced this morning that this isn't good enough, either. He wants both the cuts and the union-busting provisions, and will accept nothing less.

That said, it is interesting that a Republican state senator is open to a resolution that would deny the conservative governor his full agenda. It's worth keeping an eye out for other cracks in the united GOP front.
icon url

teapeebubbles

02/22/11 3:55 PM

#81813 RE: SchlumpyStock-Picker #81759

Wisconsin Gov. Walker Ginned Up Budget Shortfall To Undercut Worker Rights

Brian Beutler | February 17, 2011, 1:47PM33K

Wisconsin's new Republican governor has framed his assault on public worker's collective bargaining rights as a needed measure of fiscal austerity during tough times.

The reality is radically different. Unlike true austerity measures -- service rollbacks, furloughs, and other temporary measures that cause pain but save money -- rolling back worker's bargaining rights by itself saves almost nothing on its own. But Walker's doing it anyhow, to knock down a barrier and allow him to cut state employee benefits immediately.

Mad In Madison: Wisconsin Workers Protest Against Governor's Budget Proposals
Furthermore, this broadside comes less than a month after the state's fiscal bureau -- the Wisconsin equivalent of the Congressional Budget Office -- concluded that Wisconsin isn't even in need of austerity measures, and could conclude the fiscal year with a surplus. In fact, they say that the current budget shortfall is a direct result of tax cut policies Walker enacted in his first days in office.

"Walker was not forced into a budget repair bill by circumstances beyond he control," says Jack Norman, research director at the Institute for Wisconsin Future -- a public interest think tank. "He wanted a budget repair bill and forced it by pushing through tax cuts... so he could rush through these other changes."

"The state of Wisconsin has not reached the point at which austerity measures are needed," Norman adds.

In a Wednesday op-ed, the Capitol Times of Madison picked up on this theme.

In its Jan. 31 memo to legislators on the condition of the state's budget, the Fiscal Bureau determined that the state will end the year with a balance of $121.4 million.
To the extent that there is an imbalance -- Walker claims there is a $137 million deficit -- it is not because of a drop in revenues or increases in the cost of state employee contracts, benefits or pensions. It is because Walker and his allies pushed through $140 million in new spending for special-interest groups in January.

You can read the fiscal bureaus report here (PDF). It holds that "more than half" of the new shortfall comes from three of Walker's initiatives:

•$25 million for an economic development fund for job creation, which still holds $73 million because of anemic job growth.

•$48 million for private health savings accounts -- a perennial Republican favorite.


•$67 million for a tax incentive plan that benefits employers, but at levels too low to spur hiring.

In essence, public workers are being asked to pick up the tab for this agenda. "The provisions in his bill do two things simultaneously," Norman says. "They remove bargaining rights, and having accomplished that, make changes in the benefit packages." That's how Walker's plan saves money. And when it's all said and done, these workers will have lost their bargaining rights going forward in perpetuity.
icon url

teapeebubbles

02/22/11 4:28 PM

#81814 RE: SchlumpyStock-Picker #81759

As part of the opposition to Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's (R) union-busting efforts, thousands of Wisconsin school teachers called in "sick" last week, forcing several local districts to close temporarily. A handful of news outlets reported that some local physicians, sympathetic to the teachers' plight, wrote doctors' notes for educators who weren't actually sick.

I haven't seen independent confirmation of this, and I have no idea how widespread the practice may or may not have been. But as one might imagine, it has Fox News pretty worked up.

In fact, the Republican network is apparently outraged on multiple levels. Not only are they accusing the doctors involved of "fraud," Fox News personalities are incensed that CNN reported on the story this way: "We have been told that doctors are writing notes for some of those teachers so they won't be penalized by staying away from school. So, they are helping out the teachers."

Last night, Bill O'Reilly asked Juan Williams to comment, not just on the physicians' efforts, but on the two sentences CNN viewers heard.

"Well, let me just say, it's important I think Bill just to establish: what's the truth? What's the fact? The fact is that's outright fraud. Doctors are not supposed to make up an excuse for someone who is not sick. That's just fraud. I mean, what's next? You know, writing prescription drugs for people because you want to support their right to party? It's just totally wrong when doctors do that. [...]

"What it makes me think is that CNN may be reacting to Fox coverage or CNN just pandering and saying, 'You know what, we think we are going to just side with the unions here.' I don't know. It's puzzling to me. It hurts me to see a news organization get involved in politics to that level." [emphasis added]



Look, I don't know what happened with those doctors. If they wrote notes for folks who weren't sick, claiming they were, it would appear to be unprofessional, at a minimum.

But to hear a Fox News personality complain on the air about a "news organization getting involved in politics" is just remarkable.

As Juan Williams read the Sammon memos? Does he remember the Tea Party rallies Fox News helped organize and promote, only to have Fox News staffers gin up the right-wing crowds for the cameras?

Fox News exists to "get involved in politics" at "that level." That's the point of the network.
icon url

teapeebubbles

02/22/11 4:49 PM

#81817 RE: SchlumpyStock-Picker #81759

WALKER TURNS UP THE HEAT IN WISCONSIN, THREATENS LAYOFFS....

When Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) demands that public workers accept less pay and fewer benefits, he can make a credible case it relates to state financing. But as is obvious by now, Walker is going much further, demanding that most unionized public employees in the state also abandon their collective bargaining rights, which is unrelated to the budget.

The point, of course, is to be punitive -- Walker doesn't like unions, so he's trying to break them.

Today, the far-right governor took the next step, threatening to take away public-sector jobs unless his unnecessary demands are met. (via Barbara Morrill)

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker warns that state employees could start receiving layoff notices as early as next week if a bill eliminating collective bargaining rights isn't passed soon.

Walker said Tuesday in a statement to The Associated Press that the layoffs wouldn't take effect immediately. He didn't say which workers would be targeted.



There can be no doubt as to the punitive nature of the policy here. Walker doesn't need to start laying off state employees, and the bill to gut collective bargaining rights has nothing to do with these workers' employment status.

This, in other words, is a thuggish threat -- give Walker the union-busting bill he wants, or he'll start making unemployment worse on purpose.

As far as the governor is concerned, the two are related, since the pending state legislation include benefit and wage "reforms," too. But Walker has a choice -- the unions would agree to his demands on compensation and benefits, if only he'd let them keep the collective bargaining rights state employees earned generations ago. That is, incidentally, an agreement that Wisconsin voters broadly endorse, and it could be approved quickly, making layoffs unnecessary and ending the protests.

But not only has Walker deemed this insufficient, he's now prepared to start handing out pink slips next week, just because he can.