News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stockchick

02/16/11 9:22 AM

#56715 RE: asus #56714

He won't because he does not have the knowledge or background to do so. But MG knows this so he will not try to do so. He will try to do things that he does have the skill to do and is probably doing just that. "Never let the things you can"t do keep you from doing the things you can". He knows enough about it to know he can't do it. This is a good thing. Much more mature than a mortgage clerk who suddenly thinks he can direct technicle development and be a CTO. The difference is in knowing what you can and can't do. I have much more respect for the things MG has not done than the dissaster that happens when someone thinks they can do something they have no clue or background in nor the foresight to find someone who does.
icon url

desert man

02/16/11 10:54 AM

#56717 RE: asus #56714

Hey Asus--what I was trying to say is that if Bev and MG just came out now and said--"hey, we gave it a last ditch effort and weren't able to save this"--I feel that in the eyes of the current shareholders (whoever is left) that they wouldn't be held fully responsible. As you yourself have said--other past managers have failed too. I agree 100% that they should have (and should be keeping us now) much more informed--especially since they were so vocal about the exact same lack of info back in the old days. I have no idea why they don't just come out and tell us what is happening? I don't think they will be blamed too much if this thing doesn't work out-- as long as they are just honest with us--NOW. But with no info from them at all for quite some time and just a mention of "Ba-beat on face book" which is actually somewhat infuriating--they aren't winning too many hearts on here.

No one even knows WTF we are even trying to do anymore?--if we are even trying at all. I really wonder if they are even spending any time at all on this or not?--I highly doubt it. And that may be because there is nothing they can do but wait for some other company to make a decision. If that's the case then what harm would there be in just telling the shareholders? I would think that there should be some intrinsic value in just telling folks the way it is. There really seems to be quite a few of us on here with differing opinions about a lot of things that have happened over the years with Reeltime. But, I do believe that many here are quite intelligent and pro-active and I would think that most are extrememly dissappointed in how this has all NOT worked out. A great idea spoiled--or so it appears right now. I wish all who try to get this company going all of the best--and many here want to be supportive--but so far no one managing this thing has really earned that right yet.