News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Biochemist2002

02/12/11 11:55 AM

#131961 RE: balihi #131956

is not considered that it is "not an offering" until you show them it isnt,and the SEC doesnt rely on the "obvious",they want facts



They didn't file anything saying it wasn't an offering, because it wasn't. That's the SECs hangup.

What information was he supposed to supply to prove it wasn't an offering. All they did was cite the law back to the SEC and the SEC agreed. See the case law they cited below:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1412126/000093041310005910/filename1.htm

Shouldn't the regulators already know the law as good as Ken's lawyers did? I think so. His lawyers were like, "uh, hello, here's the law...why are you saying it's an offering...it's not." LOL

Just my point, sometimes the regulators don't know the regulations.

I don't want to argue though. I appreciate the discussion though.
icon url

eiddle

02/12/11 12:26 PM

#131964 RE: balihi #131956

Excellent post. Post of the week award nominee.