Replies to post #130431 on Golkor Inc (GKOR)

[usafa]

I'd like to point out that we also don't have any specific information on hole #1 like we do for the 10M of #2.

This is all we have about #1:

The hole intersected mafic volcanic rocks, conglomerates and mafic intrusive rocks that contain indications of sub-economic copper mineralization throughout most of the drill hole (including native copper and chalcopyrite). The conglomerate unit is also strongly hematite altered, which could explain the gravity anomaly. The upper part of the magnetics geophysical anomaly is coincident with a thick magnetic mafic dyke.

[stokes1]

Certainly possible but its hard to speculate positive on this company anymore. Not trying to bash, but its best to set the bar low with KATX and hopefully they surprise you. Gump's theory about "less than fanatstic news" travelling on the mule train seems to have some merit. And considering how long the mule train has been at work here, I'd be lying if I said I wasn't concerned. But maybe there was an added delay introduced here getting the new IR firm in between the next RR PR regardless of positive/negative. That's my theory...

[Stayahead]

I think we have a new IR firm because we are going to be reporting some great results and plans and Ken wants to make sure that it happens as it should.

If he was going to just move on to another property and give up on HC and RR why would he need a new IR firm.

This is all starting to come together.