News Focus
News Focus
icon url

AARGUS

02/07/11 12:33 PM

#130367 RE: gump90 #130366

FWIW, I disagree completely.
(except for the "Truth" part and you being wrong).....

glta

icon url

stokes1

02/07/11 12:36 PM

#130369 RE: gump90 #130366

Gump I do mostly agree with your post. Especially if the law firm is on the outs and we report bad hole 2 results, there's no doubt we're in damage control. I do think we have a bit more money than we think remaining however... they don't seem concerned to spend money on an IR firm let's put it that way.

But regarding hole 2, even I think it will be a dud. I just can't comprehend why they would hold back results this long if they were garbage... but I am ready for some garbage numbers, I thought today was going to be the day...
icon url

Funaboard

02/07/11 12:48 PM

#130376 RE: gump90 #130366

What hole #2 are you referring to? The one that is 300 miles away from KATX property?

Mr G I like this part of the PR:

"CFSG1 will introduce KAT Gold management to targeted individual and institutional investors who are experienced with the Company's mining sector, understand its potential and can address its financial needs going forward."

Looks like things are under control mode.

I'm getting my yellow submarine ready for a cruise to check out possible off shore drilling sites. Wana go with?
icon url

ShortonCash

02/07/11 1:17 PM

#130387 RE: gump90 #130366

What would call " lousy Hole 2 results" for a REE deposit

How many grams per ton?
Can you give a limits of nonminable deposit, at what width and depth and what happens if other minerals are also recoveralbe.
Can you give some figures? So every one here will know when the news.