InvestorsHub Logo

genisi

02/03/11 10:28 AM

#113957 RE: RockRat #113956

Same here.

y3maxx

02/03/11 10:34 AM

#113958 RE: RockRat #113956

"I'm willing to believe ItalFarmaco has a role as a manufacturer. But I'm a lot less willing to believe that T-enox is Lupenox. Maybe some day we'll know for sure."

Makes sense RockRat....hence MNTA's lawsuit thru discovery

2/
Dew et al, Might SNY consider straight generic pricing for potential competitive purposes?

One competitor being better than two or three.

If so, would it make Teva's potential T enox unprofitable and unappetizing?

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend"

3/
genisi
Teva's actions since July are all about protecting Copax to every degree...care to deny this fact?

4/
Currently TEVA is trading down @$1 Billion while MNTA is up @$250K.

tia

y3

dewophile

02/03/11 11:59 AM

#113962 RE: RockRat #113956

i too find it hard to believe teva achieved "chemical sameness" with a drug that has an average MW that is some 13% lower than branded lovenox (lupenox 3900 kDa, lovenox 4500)
i was even surprised amphastar's product passed with a consistent batch to batch MW difference of some 5% back in 2004/5 (4700 kDa)

DewDiligence

02/03/11 12:52 PM

#113968 RE: RockRat #113956

You can lead a horse to water, but…