News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Eagle1969

02/01/11 12:12 PM

#1914 RE: skyhi #1913

I was surprised that the BCSC staffer told him that as you usually do not talk about the details of an investigation until it is over. But I do not work there or know why he might have said that --there is a big push for transparency in many government agencies today ; the staffer might have been inviting information, so who knows.
icon url

Jackroch

02/01/11 7:39 PM

#1990 RE: skyhi #1913

It is definitely in the zone of "hearsay" - whether discussing these matters with an authority is legal or not.

Phone calls are psychotic - they have no memory. Unlike a paper trail, it is hard to trace what is verbally said and hearsay evidence is inadmissible in courts and mediation.

Anyone who has ever played the telephone drill where a message is reported between people with a whisper knows that while unintentional always, what is said on one end comes out different on the other.

On this CPOW board, I would like to try to keep the data flowing as cleanly as possible with evidence brought to the table to back up anything stated as a fact.

Good luck to CPOW investors.