Replies to post #16653 on Pilgrim Petroleum Corp. (PGPM)

[lazlotrade]

red here also. agree with your last statement for now. we have matt for better or worse - must hope it's better; at least he communicates. compared to rp that is a positive improvement - no guarantee, but at least could be a start justifying some good faith (even if we had a choice). of course, compared to the way rp treated us misfits, homey the clown would have been an improvement (no offense intended, matt, just a comment on the really crappy history - our lots are cast, don't let the misfits down). just an educated guess based on years of postings, but would think this board has represented hundreds of millions of shares if posted comments/insinuations have not been outrageously inflated. how many are left? ? ? ? ? ? only the shadow knows. i only have few million left (would have been more impressive at one time - not so now).

laz

[awesomebummer]

Is he the same, or related to...


Quote: "but keeps hitting a wall at every turn. (Brian Bulloch)"


as this partner of PGPM's accounting/audit firm? - see below:

BULLOCH, DUPERTUIS, SEGER & COMPANY, P.C.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


'bummer.

[awesomebummer]

If, repeat if, a director is doing this:

Quote: "From what I know talking to Matt, he's continuing to come up with ways to resolve this (ACLY LEASES) among other things, but keeps hitting a wall at every turn. (Brian Bulloch)"

Then, the question is why?

I.e., why is a director, who's accounting firm issues PGPM's financial statements based on information provided by "management" (note: so, this is not an audit!), providing resistance to PGPM's President; who, in turn, is trying to recover properties that were not properly supervised and operated by an affiliated firm?

Hard to believe the answer could be anything but bad.