You really don't understand??
Nonetheless, the fact that someone who may or may not be working for expo once worked for Lowes, how is that meaningful in any way? In all liklihood they were fired or laid off, or they would still be working at Lowes. It certainly is equally as likely that any connection to Lowes is a negative, but its most likely meaningless.
Producing products at a loss in order to render public shares worthless is good? Could you explain that more slowly please?
In any case, it is imperative to continuously chronicle the perpetual "fail to deliver" that is exph plywood and sawdust doghouses. It is important to recount the dozens of misleading and lying PRs, the shareholder meetings and website updates, as well as the outrageous fiscal irresponsibility of the management.
You can't stop everyone from buying shares and feeding the serpent, but you can stop some. I think most that have been burned here, or those who simply care about maintaining a business code of ethics and funding business that is responsive and aligned with its shareholders, would agree that warning new investors about this little piggy is a worthy use of time.
That is "the point".
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
