I may be new to this board, but I've held this stock in my portfolio since back when Bill Smith was in charge and XPLI was a subsidiary. I thought the posts might be relevant to anyone who may be relatively new to this company. You know, so they don't concentrate on this solar crap, and forget where the true potential lies.
I made a mistake in my post about the revenue yesterday. I meant that, judging from the capacity stated in one of those old articles and knowing the industry margins, 25 million in net profit should be possible this year with the subsidy. That figure doesn't take into account any tax liability, nor any liability from their solar operations.