News Focus
News Focus
icon url

bowman88

01/14/11 7:00 PM

#8177 RE: tweaktheflange #8174

Thanks for posting the full article, we haven't lost them yet. Looks like the case is waiting on another ruling.
icon url

hang ten

01/14/11 7:05 PM

#8178 RE: tweaktheflange #8174

Tweak, thanks for effort with the article.. Here's the docket link:
http://docs.bmcgroup.com/Corus/docs/ilnb_1-10-ap-01362_38.pdf

I must say, any bank 'victory' vs the fdic will be regarded as precedence, imo. Considering Errett's last post (I agree), we know the fdic is highly motivated to win this and all cases against banks in bk.
icon url

jmbell42

01/16/11 12:47 PM

#8193 RE: tweaktheflange #8174

Tweak,

Thanks for the full posting.

It's interesting that the FDIC is fighting jurisdiction in this case. Am I correct in thinking that, in the case of WAMUQ, the FDIC has no issues dealing with the tax refunds within the context of BK?

If so, then I wonder why the FDIC is willing to work within the context of a BK court in one case (i.e. WAMU) and yet fight a similar proceeding in CORSQ?

Seems like more of a stall tactic than anything else... could they just be playing hardball for a favorable settlement?

Jared