News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Justice37

01/04/11 7:30 PM

#87734 RE: wEaReLeGiOn #87727

It needs to go the blending site, then it's the same as any fuel sold to the public, plastic is made from fuel, the catalyst JBI have breaks it back to it's original form, when the plastic is clean, nothing else in it, there is less than 1% waste, I think it was 0.2% paraffin wax. It passes ASTM standard, all that is needed for a fuel to be fuel, the same fuel, can be sold at pumps, your saying it can't doesn't change the fact that it will, coming to an independent gas station...well hopefully near me (I live in Niagara).

What part of my last post was not clear, the original Islechem report came out last April, I explained that near diesel meant that there was a small percentage of gasoline in the diesel, it can now be separated, the plans to do this was in the PR from last April, works now. Again, what part of three companies validated the fuel. Give them a call, say what JB said on the CC, public record, tell them it's not true, see how far you get with that.

I say there is proof, you so no you don't and provide none, lets go back and forth some more.
icon url

Steady_T

01/04/11 9:59 PM

#87774 RE: wEaReLeGiOn #87727

EPA or any other testing agency won't have any trouble calling it diesel. One look at the chromatograph from IsleChem and there will be no discussion.

You are flogging a dead horse on this issue.