News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Slojab

12/28/10 10:59 AM

#5469 RE: lazyeye #5468

The whole thing, imo, is not to create an equine development, but to acquire this property. It's a gentleman's ranch and incapable of supporting a revenue producing public company.

As a "showcase" for their supposed development, it's a joke. This should either be a private residence or a smalltime private business where the owner lives onsite.

All this is being done on the shareholder's dime, like you said, lazy. When this public company fails, what do you suppose will happen to this property? Of course, before that happens, it'll have been fixed up, repaired, remodeled, improved, etc, through dilution.

icon url

nostocks

12/28/10 6:29 PM

#5470 RE: lazyeye #5468

I agree but more then likely it's the legal though unscrupulous means they've chosen to ripoff investors.

IMO, bordering on criminal.