This is my interpretation. All of Hole 1 has been assayed in the parts that the geos chose that looked a little bit good. I think Hole 2 has been completely done too but using only 2 REE s and not the full suite. They did these on the hottest looking parts as path-finders. Now with some encouragement they are 'fleshing out' the whole REE suite to check on the various other elements. The assays for these beefed-up sections are now starting to come in. Please read the P R carefully. I really think however that they are into a learning curve and the full suite is also going to be ho-hum. But we shall wait some more.
A coincidence :) I have to tell you, I'm lost here too. If not mistaken, the people that have talked to Ken somehow confirm only data received to date are of the upper part of hole2. I think daggfish and elcheepo did talk to Ken after PR. Also in the PR they say indication of sub-economic copper mineralization troughout the complete 700+ meters. I find "indication" to point to that they guess because they have no data. Maybe a geologist jumped the gun here to state such a thing. OD ore was impossible to judge by the naked eye, so why would they do this here.
These were my questions too. I'm posting them again hoping somebody might shed some light.
1. Why release only 10% of the results?
2. Why even mention that there was sub-economic copper from what was seen?
3. Where are the assays for any minerals that were found? If we don't have any assays why even mention anything about what they think was or wasn't there?
4. Why currently double the size of RR?
I've read the PR no less than 10 times and all I have are more questions.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
