Couldn't agree more. Cool heads prevail. I'm not jumping to any conclusions. The consumer advocate report just adds another variable into the picture IMO. It was inevitable that someone was going to say that the PPA was bad for the ratepayers of NH. One would be delusion to think that wasn't going to be some form of opposition to the PPA. The PUC was never going to rubber stamp this IMO anyways. The process might get drawn out a bit longer, but in the end a couple of bucks a month extra, isn't going to make a difference compared to the overall economic benefit of the project IMO.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
