re BNK, Morgan Stanley put out a report on the Palo Duro Basin Basin Friday, some of the main points were
- they DON'T expect the Barnett play in Texas to be a one-of shale play
- they mention Vintage Petroleum and BNK as being the big acreage holders in the area, that EOG is looking for another shale play in Texas, and they expect other players
- they estimate unrisked potential of 1.55 TCF per 100k acres (2.94 TCF for Vintage on 190k acres, 3.34 TCF for BNK on 216k acres)
- acreage costs have gone from $10 last year to $50
- they feel it is comparable to the Barnett play as even though the total organic content (TOC) of Palo Duro is less lower (estimated 2.5% vs 4% for Barnett) the Palo Duro is generally thicker
- still need to determine the best way to frac, this expense might turn out to be a little cheaper than Barnett due to natural fracturing, it has a non-water bearing seal and the presense of sand stringers
- Vintage has drilled a well for a core sample, we find out the results in about four weeks, after that will do a completion test on a second well that is currently drilling
-Petroglobe is another company (not mentioned in the report) with a 10% interest in 65,000 acres of Vintage's land.
-Tyner Resources has small interest in some of Bankers land.
All potential mentioned above in unrisked, so apply your own discount.
EDIT: this kind of reminds me of ELH all over again, hopefully I fair better
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
