News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Banks

12/20/10 11:45 AM

#82726 RE: spencerforhire #82724

Thanks
icon url

purplemountain

12/20/10 12:03 PM

#82732 RE: spencerforhire #82724

Thanks Spence. This is from the Office of the Consumer Advocate (OCA), not the PUC staff itself (which would still only be advisory - the staff does not make decisions for the COmmissioners).

For those unfamiliar with PUC structure, OCA is an independent office charged with advocating for residential ratepayer interests (maybe commerial as well, but I think just the small folks). It would be very suprising for OCA to back a 1.5(ish) billion dollar PPA.

I would say that this position by OCA could have been guessed - with great accuracy - months ago. It is just now available for all to read. This doesn't mean it isn't (or is) legit - just means that it is one position (of many) that the PUC will need to consider as they make their decision.
icon url

21Reggie33

12/20/10 12:05 PM

#82734 RE: spencerforhire #82724

BLECH!
icon url

Grozny

12/20/10 12:33 PM

#82760 RE: spencerforhire #82724

Key word there "consumer advocate". This is not a decision by the PUC.
icon url

Matilda007

12/20/10 2:08 PM

#82823 RE: spencerforhire #82724

Where in the hell is the utilities supposed to get their mandated

"Renewable energy" source as a percentage of their overall power

supply???