"imo drilling to define each anomaly will occur much sooner than the time line you're urging people to be "cautious" about."
I never suggested nor intended anything more than we should all be cautious about expected timelines TO DEVELOPMENT of all, or most all of the targets.
Otherwise, I very strongly agree that proving what is in the ground will be necessary in order to strategically prioritize targets, and where on each target first efforts should be located.