Are WMI and Rosen really the Plaintiffs? I thought it was the EC another party like the EC asking for the Debtors (WMI and Rosen) to be limited from using the Attorney Client Work Product as evidence proving their Plan is "fair and reasonable" since they would not disclose it in Discovery when we were trying to find out before the hearing what evidence they would use to prove their Plan was "fair and reasonable." The Debtors claimed Attorney Client Privilege and "you can't see it" and also told the Court they would not rely upon Privileged material to prove their case when we asked that it be produced anyway. The Judge told them OK you don't have to produce it if you are not going to use it. Now they want to use it. We want them to not be able to use it because we can't look at it before hand. This is not fair under the rules of evidence, so we asked for it to be limited. The Judge ruled against us. We are the Plaintiff, they are the Debtor Defendants. IMHO
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
