There are a lot of "real companies" that have turned into "scams" Whether it is a "real company" isn't even an issue, nor what ever the assets are at this point, in my eyes. Its all the criminal activity that has been documented and shown to a grand jury for review so our government can't just arbitrarily go around on a "witch hunt" and the rest of our due process and civil rights as US citizens we enjoy. That I have enough faith that justice will be served. Been doing a little reading up on Application of the Presumption of Innocence It is not wrong to state a belief that someone is guilty. It would work against the First Amendment to demand that all citizens agree with all jury verdicts. Just from the documentation I have seen I have no doubt laws have been broken and the rest of the due process is a slam dunk! I just hope they find all the missing money and get any ill-gotten money back from the "special" friends!
Aside from the related requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the presumption of innocence is largely symbolic. The reality is that no defendant would face trial unless somebody—the crime victim, the prosecutor, a police officer—believed that the defendant was guilty of a crime. After the government has presented enough evidence to constitute Probable Cause to believe that the defendant has committed a crime, the accused need not be treated as if he or she was innocent of a crime, and the defendant may be jailed with the approval of the court.
Nevertheless, the presumption of innocence is essential to the criminal process. The mere mention of the phrase presumed innocent keeps judges and juries focused on the ultimate issue at hand in a criminal case: whether the prosecution has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the alleged acts. The people of the United States have rejected the alternative to a presumption of innocence—a presumption of guilt—as being inquisitorial and contrary to the principles of a free society. In Countries who adhere to a presumption of guilt, the burden of proving innocence is up to the charged party.