News Focus
News Focus
icon url

zipjet

12/03/10 10:52 AM

#109889 RE: mouton29 #109887

In fact, I thought the classic law school example of a case where an injunction was justified was where you neighbor was about to burn down your house.



Not only is TEVA ready to "burn down the house" they have been advertising the fact to the financial community of just how soon they will do it.

:-)

ij
icon url

RockRat

12/03/10 11:01 AM

#109890 RE: mouton29 #109887

If Momenta/Sandoz can prove it's already in the country for commercial use (i.e. not just a bit sitting in an FDA lab) -- even if not approved and thus not yet ready to be offered for sale -- that's all they need under statute. Given that small things can be moved pretty quickly, who knows where the stockpile actually is? Though Teva says t-enox is made and tested ex-US that does not mean it is STILL ex-US. If Teva really believes approval is imminent and they want to hit the ground running, they would have the stockpile in the US. I somewhat doubt this; Teva may well have seen this tactic coming. And . . .

Has Teva said anything like Sandoz did about a year ago, that they were taking orders from customers? Nope.

Regards, RockRat