doesn't amount to distrusting Woodworth's position on rising sea levels in the Falklands then what? It sure as hell doesn't sound like you trust that work of his..
"why do you distrust Prof. Philip Woodworth?"
So, forget repeating this bs, of yours, too ..
"Why in the world are you making stuff up again? Haven't we been here before... you are accusing me of something I haven't done?"
To your .. "If you are referring to me questioning the theory of global warming or rising tides then that's entirely different."
Sheeezzz, I don't know if you do or not, i searched your posts for "global warming" and for "climate change" 2007-2010, AND didn't find one clear position by you on it. That's why i knew you had been silent on it and that's why i asked you about it.
To your .. "As a general rule I do not believe anything that is said to be so until I have had a chance and desire to look into the facts so that I can have an informed opinion. Some people believe stuff without doing any of their own research or checking of facts. So no... I don't have an opinion on that subject but, I feel confident that a rock that was painted yellow in 1841 is not a reliable datum for extracting sub mm measurements from 150 years later!"
rotflmao! .. so you distrust the science that the vast, some 98%, number of climate scientists agree on. You have to do your own research!!! LOLOLOL Also, yeah, some people don't check facts, it's funny that some of those are the ones you tend to agree with here.
To YOUR .. "3rd reply and no response to what?" .. i know one thingy of yours is to play dumb .. why? .. this of mine
"Oh, one other thing .. this is the 3rd reply to your post here, how come no response from you to the other two?