"but there is no disputing that the current 43-101 verifies the work done by GEMCOM and proves 2.8M ounces"
I dispute it and I disagree, for what it's worth, your assessment of the NI 43-101. So, there. lol...
"verifies"? "proves"? I don't think so.
This report has been prepared by David Brown & Associates using public and private documents given to the author for this purpose. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this report, David Brown & Associates cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of all supporting documentation. In particular, David Brown & Associates did not attempt to determine the veracity of geochemical, geophysical, or geological data reported by third parties, or to conduct duplicate sampling for comparison with the geochemical results provided by other parties. Only two, two-day field reconnaissance visits were conducted, and a gross geometric modeling was made for volumetric ore grade determinations, as presented in the 2006 43-101 report. In addition, a preliminary draft volumetric ore grade determination was made by a third party in 1996 and presented in the 2009 43-101 report. Consequently, the use of this report shall be at the user’s sole risk and David Brown & Associates hereby disclaims any and all liabilities arising out of the use or distribution of this report or reliance by any party on the data herein. The author’s interpretive views expressed herein may or may not reflect the views of Dutch or other investigators.
Note: The whole disclaimer statement should have been colored red, bolded and underlined, lol...vis a vis this disclaimer...it doesn't get ANY CLEARER than this > "or reliance by any party on the data herein" = DGRI got nothin'!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
