News Focus
News Focus
icon url

phrantic

11/21/10 12:52 PM

#15551 RE: Cee-It #15550

GM Cee. Your objective/analytical review of this science is as impressive as it is accurate and appreciated. Sounds like you've done some digging into AsepticSure and are very much aware of the intended uses. All of your concerns have been succinctly addressed through all the testing via beta and lab, except for one, reactive corrosion/degradation as it relates to plastics and electronics. This has been a major concern of mine, as well. Many months ago I had emailed the CEO concerning this exact issue and was told that yes, the testing to that point in time was inclusive of these particular factions, as well as others, and remain ongoing. I was also informed at that point in time the tests had demonstrated no degradation relative to a multitude of substances, including but not limited to plastics, rubber, sensitive electronics, etc. The company is not in the habit of announcing speculative results on such matters, so I don't expect we'll hear anything until the tests enable adequate and verifiable scientifc data which define articuable conclusions. I'm persuaded by ongoing events, especially the recent announcement of a very impressive and significant LOC agreement which rarely, if ever, are offered to OTC companies, that there is great overall confidence in this science and its efficacy for which it is designed.
icon url

waterdog451

11/21/10 12:58 PM

#15552 RE: Cee-It #15550

obviously, you didn't read my post very closely. I SAID that our system ALSO REMOVES the lingering ozone from the atmosphere AFTER the pathogens are killed. This process we ALSO have patent pending.
icon url

waterdog451

11/21/10 12:59 PM

#15553 RE: Cee-It #15550

Too much chocolate cake will kill you too.
icon url

waterdog451

11/21/10 1:12 PM

#15557 RE: Cee-It #15550

Lastly, I assure you that our scientists would completely refute what you say about ozone's negative effect on plastics, wiring, etc. This has been something we've been very careful of from the very onset of our initiative. Furthermore, I'd serioulsly doubt their are ANY other scientists/laboratories out there with more experience and/or more credentials especially when dealing with ozone than ours. Do the DD.
icon url

BenK

11/21/10 4:17 PM

#15568 RE: Cee-It #15550

Many months ago I sent an e-mail to management, which was forwarded to Dr. Shannon for him to respond. I asked if they are confident that there can be no injury to patients whose respitory systems are compromised by disease or allergies, through exposure to any residue of ozone that may linger after treatment with AsepticSure.

Here's his reply:

"The EPA standard for workplace ozone levels is 0.08 PPM for not more than 4 hours. Our scrubbing process brings the ozone levels down to 0.02 PPM and due to our use of high powered fans, there should be no residual pockets of the gas at higher concentrations. Since ozone is 1.66 times heavier than air, it might collect as a residual at floor level in any given room, where we place additional sensors. In our scale-up trials, we have never had a problem."

About the effect on plastics and electronics in the treated room, the Company has said repeatedly in press releases that they have been testing various materials in their labs, with no negative results. The scientific team is putting their considerable reputations on the line. I would not worry about that.
icon url

Manti

11/21/10 7:58 PM

#15572 RE: Cee-It #15550

I suspect the small amount of hydrogen peroxide they've added to the mix is doing a pretty good job of eliminating those radicals.

Now, if we could just get the radicals out of the WH...;-)