Blackhawks... I never said the poster of the "article" was an employee. You see, yet again, you gotta stop changing words and things that I say. I said he might be a GOIG related party (executive/empolyee/contractor etc) heck, might even be a family member for all we know. I'm not stating who he is, I'm stating whom he might be.
I'm certainly not going to waste my time trying to find out if it's an employee etc or not, but I will suggest that it is, after all, it's only my opinion, right?
Now of course he can change his "story" (blog) any time he wants, and that might not prove he's an "agent" for GOIG. What it does do, though, is raise questions as to why all of a sudden it was changed when no reason for the removal of the material was given. Then again, if you change my words and say that I say things which I didn't say, I could see how you wouldn't think that removing information from a post/blog without giving a reason has no significance or meaning either.
Oh well, another topic we disagree on.