I'm amazed myself about the degree of absolute certainty people portray on the internet re someone's guilt prior to conviction.
It's done everywhere without hesitance, which I have hated from the day I invested anything on the internet. Just because something is a sworn statement, it doesn't provide certainty of conviction. That's just basic.
Now I will add that I myself might refer to someone as guilty, doing so informally, depending on the context. Yet here, people
talk as if the case has been completely wrapped up. Again I say, on the net people will shriek "Scam" at the mere possibility that had entered their minds. So we need to take what is said as being part of the net scenario, which is impossible to change. We used to be told to hold back on that, but not any more in these situations. If for some reason they end up being wrong, they won't even apologize and/or correct themselves on any matter. I'm not saying they are wrong re Owen, but the principle was created for a reason.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
