News Focus
News Focus
icon url

skunksyard

03/06/05 11:56 AM

#51032 RE: Phil(Hot Rod Chevy) #51030

Phil..there's a difference between 'skilled research' as many folks here may do and just plain harrassment....there are many opposite opinions that are left on that board...but clearly at QBID as opposed to the 'challenging posts' at CMKX is the major component of an attempt to discredit the company..when you walk in someones house and that's your intent you will not be welcomed. Let me show you the difference. There are many, many very good PR's coming from QTN the past several months (and yes there are a few that have not yet materialized)...if the folks who were the 'opposers' gave credit to the constructive things Frank Olsen has done, his major national alignments, etc, then their opposing posts would have a different ring to them...

Like I said....to me there is a major difference between 'skilled researchers' who present an 'opposing' opinion that is backed by facts and those that simply come to a board to disrupt...and post after post are personal attacks on the folks who dd the stock...

I have been in stocks JS and company have challenged. I never had a problem with that...you present your facts, I read them, I then make up my mind whether it makes sense to stay in or not based on what I read...that's quite different from attacking Frank Olsen with no supporting evidence that he isn't moving forward and much supporting evidence IMO that he is...delays don't create scams...they are delays, plain and simple.

I like intelligence on a board. I don't have to agree or disagree with the person. I just like to read intelligent posts. These folks that post at QBID who's posts have been deleted in many cases have either personally attacked over and over and over or have presented no evidence to their constant bashing of the stock...
icon url

junkmasterg

03/06/05 2:05 PM

#51056 RE: Phil(Hot Rod Chevy) #51030

well it's really only one

over there with the delete fever... the other two are fair