to what do we owe your expertise at deciding the signficance of the data?
A) Mathmatical degree with a focus on statistical analysis of biological data?
B) Biological degree in which you are accustomed to statistical analysis of biological data?
C) none of the above?
If A or B, then shame on you...you assume much from a poorly worded and vague PR. You do not have the data set to interpret the significance or not.... and yes it was perhaps a poorly and vaguely worded PR...if you are at odds with that, I think there is 100% agreement on this board...as far as the significance...you are wrong....I am not going to argue the opposite, I can't say it was, but I know enough to say that I don't know the trial, the design, the purpose, nor will I jump to the conclusion that "this is not good"
If C, please explain...how can you determine the significance? is it a hunch you have? if that is the case...you may be right, but you may be wrong too...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
