News Focus
News Focus
icon url

satorino

10/29/02 4:23 PM

#39574 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Zeev,
this is one of your most lucid writing. bellissimo.
satorino

icon url

mainehiker

10/29/02 4:26 PM

#39577 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Zeev totally agree that rates should be
raised and your reasoning is clear....but not sure he wont cave in and cut

icon url

Softechie

10/29/02 4:30 PM

#39579 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

AG manipulating the market?

icon url

Pinhi

10/29/02 4:37 PM

#39586 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Zeev, outstanding post re: raising rates. Couldn't agree more FWIW.

Pinhi

icon url

lostalot

10/29/02 4:48 PM

#39590 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Zeev: Lower rate will keep consumer spending floating in the mist of huge consumer confidence drop in Oct. It is the consumer spending to keep economy dipping back to recession. Fed must do everything they could to keep consumers to spend. So, I want Fed to lower rate rather than raising rates. Neither lower or raising rate will prompt business to spend anyway.

icon url

gtober

10/29/02 4:49 PM

#39591 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Zeev, i tend to agree with your conclusions. But, could the consumer handle a rate hike at precisely the point in time they seem to be crapping out.

GT

icon url

jdaasoc

10/29/02 5:04 PM

#39596 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Agree that next move is not down. The longer he hold rates steady, the more pressure for completion of bonds assets into equities conversion that has happened since 7/22 will continue awaiting the recovery in economy.

Rate hike is coming next year when pricing power returns to the likes of CSCO INTC etc.

That is wild card. Pricing power right now looks ropey and lower rates don't help one iota.

icon url

Gizmo

10/29/02 5:07 PM

#39597 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Just chiming in here <g> Good post.

Gizmo

icon url

leon

10/29/02 5:33 PM

#39606 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

i think zeev is absolutely correct on what should happen. but, what should and actually does happen are not necessarily in sync. it seems to me that regardless of the feds action next week we are going to be presented with an excellent trading opportunity. if the fed stands pat, i would expect an initial plunge in the mkts followed by a strong rally after the consensus view formulates that the economy must be stronger than "we" realize or the fed would have lowered. conversely, any cut will probably be met by strong buying pressure until that same consensus few now recognizes how really weak this economy must be and begins to earnestly dump all stocks. if this scenario plays out as i suspect, the stategy s/b to short the "cut" as the rally unfolds and aggressively buy the initial dump if there is no fed change. anyway, thats my view at the moment subject to how other events may unfold between now and next weeks meeting.

icon url

pstuartb

10/29/02 5:41 PM

#39607 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Zeev - I'm wondering about your rate hike comments. With capacity utilization so low, and corporate debt loads so high, why would businesses rush forward with capex plans if faced with a rate hike? An argument could be made that there is relatively little pent up demand for new cap expenditures, and that many companies can not afford it. And with consumer debt levels so high, wouldn't a hike discourage additional consumer spending? Since consumer spending is nearly double that of business, wouldn't a reduction in housing refies and increase in consumer interest rates potentially offset any business spending? You know more than I do about these issues, but it seems to me that at this point rate movements are less likely to cure the economy's ills than the reduction of debt and the passage of time.

icon url

retired cfo

10/29/02 6:51 PM

#39624 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Hey Zeev:

Just remember - two parts of the equation - rates and willingness of banks/markets to lend.

The credit committees of the banks are being VERY tough on terms, amounts, ratios, etc. LBO guys (KKR, Bain, Onex, Hicks-Muse, Willis Stein, etc. etc) were getting 5x-6x EBITDA 30 months ago. Now lucky to get 3.5x. Note how relatively few LBO deals have been announced; they can't get funded at terms that work.

I don't disagree with any of your points on impact or direction, only that banks are doing again what they did in 90-91, playing the spread on treasuries rather than loan to businesses.

all the best
gsm

icon url

JMKel

10/29/02 9:20 PM

#39655 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Interesting point of view...there is a crisis of confidence in CAPEX spending not consumer spending. Food for thought....

icon url

m1o2n3i4c5k6

11/02/02 6:36 PM

#41308 RE: Zeev Hed #39566

Zeev, today Bob Brinker felt that because of the recent bad business news, (higher unemployment, etc) AG will cut the rate again by .25 or .50 basis points.

Assuming that occurs, what is your opinion as to the immediate impact on the Nas. Thanks.