LOL, the game didn't sell. And even if WalMart chose only 200 stores for the games to sell in that would have represetned only 2% of 10,000 retail outlets would it not?
And since the new campaign has not stated an actual numnber of retail outlets like the 2006 campaign did you can not compare the two as there is no current data for how many retail locations are going to carry the game this time...LMAO!!!
See how easy it is to twist something into what you want it to mean in the lack of pertinent info?
You can apply your own logic to the number of retail locations for the current distribution. 2006 stated 10,000 retail locations. How many will there be this time?
You see, one can create an opinion and can utilize it. Simply because you choose to belive a penny stock CEO means nothing. I have seen promotions where the IR quotes the PR's and CEO's like there is no tomorrow only to see the stock suspended by the SEC. I havge seen promoters quote the CEO and PR's only to see the stock dulute billions of shares and go BK.
Believing penny stock hype is perhaps one of the worst things any investor could ever do.
LFBG original game never met expectations and never provided a quarterly profit. Troy said in 2006 that profitability was less than a year away. 4 years later where are the profits?
That's why I do not listen to them nor do I think they will ever be a credible source of information.
If you do then so be it. I choose to believe in my opinions because I am most generally right in my assumptions based on penny stock market data and research.
Kind of like when I said ERUC was tegnicially BK while operating and you argued for a couple months otherwise before they filed BK. What matters is the results not the hype or the debate leading up to it other than it wiull show one side to be right and one side to be wrong.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
